Skip to main content

Industry playbook

Defense & CMMC compliance

Explore an illustrative control-evidence workflow. Requirements, expertise and acceptance need scoped review.

For: Defense contractors, compliance officers and the consultancies that support them.

  • SharePoint
  • GRC tools
  • Microsoft 365 GCC
  • Ticketing
  • Spreadsheets

Documented vs real

This illustrative documented process has 4 steps. The illustrative alternative has 6.

A starting hypothesis from this kind of work. Every audit re-maps it with your team.

What the document says

  1. 1.Assess controls
  2. 2.Fix gaps
  3. 3.Collect evidence
  4. 4.Pass assessment

Illustrative exception path

  1. 1.Control list copied into a spreadsheet
  2. 2.Owners assigned by email, not tracked
  3. 3.Evidence screenshots saved in personal folders
  4. 4.Policy text drifts from what systems actually do
  5. 5.Gaps re-discovered every quarter
  6. 6.Week before assessment: everyone hunts for files

Where agents fit

  1. 1.Control-to-evidence mapping kept current
  2. 2.Evidence requests sent and tracked by owner
  3. 3.Policy-versus-configuration drift checks
  4. 4.Draft narratives for assessor review

What stays human

  1. 1.Attestation
  2. 2.Risk acceptance
  3. 3.Anything the assessor signs
Review intended security requirements — not certification →

Next step

Map your version of this process.

The opportunity audit replaces this hypothesis with your real process, your numbers and a ranked roadmap.